Everyone talks about, most admit that it exists but isn’t an
issue and others simply have learned to live with the issue – economic crime is
growing in the construction industry.
Well you simply cannot open a newspaper without hearing the
word – “fraud”, it has become less taboo to admit to it and we certainly are
sharing more about it. In a recent PwC survey 33% of respondents admitted to
having suffered an economic crime (2009: 24%). Now you may think this figure is
low, but consider that the construction industry is dominated by less regulated
entities, where reporting matters is more stringent, and privately owned
businesses means it is actually fairly high compared to other industries. Surprised?
I’m not.
The key headlines from the survey are below:
·
49%
of those reporting economic crime say it includes bribery and corruption. That’s the highest level of any industry;· Asset misappropriation tops the list of economic crime with 76% experiencing;
· Insiders committed 70% of the most serious economic crimes.
Now be honest, do any of these facts surprise you? The
nature of the industry means that bribery and corruption would be a fairly high
percentage of reported crime (though I’m not condoning it). Asset
misappropriation with sites containing large quantities of material often with
little control/security in place to protect it, could be higher in certain
situations. The below infographic demonstrates the results:
So compared to the overall sample, the construction industry
has a higher than average type of fraud across the board with the exception of
cybercrime; however the industry has lower than average levels of data to be
stolen.
It may surprise people that the construction industry has
the highest rate of bribery and corruption but think more widely than this
risk. A business that is susceptible to bribery will undoubtedly have more
underlying issues, for example accounting for the bribe will be interesting.
But despite all this should the construction industry simply
accept that these risks are present? Are material losses just part of doing
business? Think of it a different way, you may not be losing materials but even
worse accepting materials that are inferior which can then impact reputation.
So where to next with standard operating processes in the
industry outdated and therefore susceptible to manipulation, is it hopeless?
Well think about these:
·
Implemented a policy in respect of bribery and
incorporate into staff training.· Perform additional due diligence on projects, for example inspecting quality not simply quantity of materials.
· Implement an internal audit function or if too costly an independent (not necessarily external) review.
Yes the industry is susceptible but that doesn’t mean we
should accept it, many in the sector are fighting back and this is certainly
something every business should consider.
Free feel to contact me 0113 288 2276 or lee.a.wilkinson@uk.pwc.com if you wish to discuss this blog or anything relevant to
property and construction.Enjoy the weekend,
Lee